On Thu, 2004-01-08 at 10:32, C. Maj wrote: > On Wed, 7 Jan 2004, Chris Albertson waxed: > > > (see update command in cvs manpage). So, yes you could have > > multiple lines of developmentand merge them back into a main line. > > Yeah and live in a nightmare. The kernel only uses CVS as a > daily (or whatever) dump of what's in BitKeeper. People > submit patches against CVS, sure, but the "branching" is > done with BK repositories. > > http://www.bitkeeper.com/
Well without dredging up the BK vs. every other revision control software flame war, lets just point out that that wouldn't be a viable option here. I would suggest subversion, but it is easier to stick with what more people know at this moment and not force anyone to deal with the conversion of the tree one more time. -- Steven Critchfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Dev mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
