On Saturday 10 July 2004 23:48, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Back OT, Why not? It may be harder to implement (or not, check out > pug xml, a public domain implementation of a recursive XML parser.) > but in the end configuration would be easier for the end person, > and then we could take each configuration object and treat them as > such.
We've been through this before (check the archives). The end point has always been the same. No. We have a perfectly usable configuration engine. Please learn to use it. If that's not good enough, I can also give you the other reason: because Mark said so. Let's have that be the end of it. -- Tilghman _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Dev mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
