On Sunday 15 August 2004 20:59, chaye wala wrote: > I wonder what gives you authority to define what is > Asterisk Development. I suggest you review your note
Hmmm, let's see. Maybe it might be my extensive contributions to the project? > again for poor language. Please refrain from using > poor english. There are tons of development around the > Asterisk. In functionality like Management API, FAX > reception. PBX forwading, DB Interfaces. CallBack > Services. And Protocols, SIP, MGCP, H323. What is > Asterisk Development in your opinion? API, API, API. Not AGI scripting. > If you can not > help, keep your dirty mouth shut and keep on browning > your nose on folks with similar non-helpful attitude. If you don't like my contributions, then I suggest that you stop using: GotoIfTime, Cut, Eval, Exec, HasNewVoicemail, MailboxExists, Random, AddQueueMember, RemoveQueueMember, the D, e, or E flags to MeetMe, and various other patches added to the core of Asterisk over the past two years. You were asked nicely once, and you came back with a smart answer about what you thought the list criteria was. You were wrong. Please take your AGI questions to the -users list. This is the last post I'm going to make on this subject. -- Tilghman _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Dev mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
