On Tue, 2004-12-07 at 14:22 -0500, C. Maj wrote: > On Tue, 7 Dec 2004, Steven Critchfield waxed: > > 8<'s > > > Also go look into the the -cvs list. > > To split new dev work from stable work, search for russelb. > > Great, let's just ignore the vague changelog in favor of > manually searching a mailing list full of commits to CVS. > Come to think of it, why not remove the bug tracker > altogether and just make a bugs mailing list so we can > search that via a web interface, too ? > > All kidding aside, here's another nice model for keeping > people up-to-date on code changes via complete sentences: > > http://www.openbsd.org/36.html#new > > It also links to the full detailed changelog here: > > http://www.openbsd.org/plus36.html > > I know, I know, just because everybody else does it...
When a cvs commit is dealing with a bug, it mentions the bug by number. You could just as well use the cvs log function. Please don't ask developers to do work that tools have already been written to handle for you. -- Steven Critchfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Dev mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
