On Thu, 2005-01-27 at 10:55 -0700, Dan Adams wrote: > I would put my vote in for this, even though I will probably subscribe to > both head and stable lists, I think it would be great for sorting what the > message is about, since the subject of the message would containg head or > stable.
How about not splitting the list but rather forcing the users to put a tag in the subject that was either [HEAD] or [STABLE] and a filter that rejects any non conforming message back to the original poster with a copy of posting guidelines. Either they would learn to read them or they wouldn't get to clog our boxes. > On Wed, 26 Jan 2005, Jerris, Michael MI wrote: > > > I personally like Asterisk-HEAD and renaming the users list > > Asterisk-STABLE. The issue is how do we get Dev to really be a source > > code based forum, not the place people go to discuss bugs? > > > > Asterisk-STABLE: discussion of configuration, bugs, and issues with > > Asterisk Stable branch. If you run stable and are having a problem, > > post here. > > Asterisk-HEAD: discussion of configuration, bugs, and issues with > > Asterisk HEAD branch. If you run HEAD and are having a problem, post > > here. Maybe also a place to discuss new feature requests without > > attached patches to support, or does that belong in DEV? I am guessing > > here because there will be a high signal:noise on these as many are > > really "How do I do x" when it comes down to it that it should probably > > stay here. > > Asterisk-Dev: Discussion of sourcecode, API's, features in development, > > issues currently in Mantis and such, > > not for bug reports (even if it is an "issue in the code"), operational > > questions, or feature requests without code? > > -- Steven Critchfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
