Conroy, Lawrence (SMTP) wrote:

Hi Klaus, folks,

I beg to differ.

Your SIP proxy is no damn good if one of the NAPTRs is voice:X-iax2
(or voice:X-skype :), so it's a dangerous to assume that SIP is the
answer, now what was the question? In particular, I *strongly*
disagree with the argument that one should only having a single entry
in ENUM; this is poor advice.

Check out +878108781087810 for example (I'll let you argue with him :).


I agree with you - the thing I wanted to say was: Just by using several SIP NATPRs with different order does not imply that the caller will use serial forking.


Thus, if I want to have serial forking to all my sip contacs in all cases, I have to implement the logic inside an application (ser or asterisk) and publish only one sip NAPTR which points to the applications implementing the logic.

regards,
klaus
_______________________________________________
Asterisk-Dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev

Reply via email to