On Mar 2, 2005, at 6:59 PM, Greg Boehnlein wrote:
On Wed, 2 Mar 2005, Brian West wrote:
Just use CVS-HEAD.... Think just because the "stable" branch has the word stable in it... doesn't mean its stable. CVS-HEAD is no less stable than the stable branch.
I just don't understand comments like this. The entire reason that a 1.0
branch exists is to snapshot a release at a specific level, and work to
The problem is stable is old and is missing alot of the features people are wanting. Honestly we run CVS-HEAD without fail. I can get WEEKS of uptime and no crashing but we have done a lot of custom mods to asterisk that may never make it back to the public due to the fact that getting patches into CVS take ages and its just a pain in the ass to keep patches up to date when they sit on the bug tracker and rot away.
/b
_______________________________________________ Asterisk-Dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
