On Mon, 2005-05-02 at 16:46 -0700, Luigi Rizzo wrote: > > i am fine with that, but i am unhappy about the mixture, in the code, > of symbolic constants and magic numbers for apparently similar fields. > > If you support variable size strings you pretty much know that > truncations may only occur when you put strings into protocol messages; > with the current approach they might happen somewhere in the > middle of the chain, and it may be hard to tell where.
This probably has to do with the fact that Asterisk is an active project with a lot of contributors. You're right that this could lead to problems. Someone with some interest needs to sit down with the code and come up with a patch. (hint, hint) Jeff
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Asterisk-Dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
