In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Andrew Kohlsmith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On May 16, 2005 08:59 am, Tony Mountifield wrote: > > I think what is happening is that the zaptel processing invoked by ztdummy > > is not happening quite often enough due to missed jiffies. Consequently > > I suspect the incoming IAX channels are not being serviced often enough, > > and are building up a backlog. > > If ztdummy's hitting it 1024 times a second instead of 1000 wouldn't that > indicate that it was servicing it too often?
My paragraph above was referring to the current ztdummy method in 2.6 which is to hook into the kernel's tick processing or every jiffy. It is that which I think is missing slots. The 1024Hz is the completely separate RTC interrupt used by zaprtc and now by my modified ztdummy. By skipping 3 every 128 (1 every 42 or 43), it evens out at 1000/sec. Cheers Tony -- Tony Mountifield Work: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.softins.co.uk Play: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://tony.mountifield.org _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
