I recall that bug.. yes it might be a bug and I think something was done to correct it.. but wasn't major because you could have worked around it by NOT starting asterisk in that manner and NOT closing your terminal.. because people in their right minds DO NOT START asterisk like that and all reality asterisk should have died if you did that and NOT continued to run. But then again still not major. NEXT!!!

/b

On May 30, 2005, at 6:52 PM, Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk wrote:

my point was people get their karma points by doing trivial stuff
but reporting something that seems pretty fucking major, like starting asterisk -cp and getting disconnected can get you a negative

which is wrong

the whole karma system is fscked up

let the code speak for itself

roy


Den 30. mai. 2005 kl. 23.48 skrev Brian West:



You usually won't get +karma till a bug is closed and resolved. If then they forget say something at that time.

/b

On May 30, 2005, at 12:56 PM, Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk wrote:




hi

what are the basis on which the 'karma' on the mantis is given? My current karma is currently -2 although I've probably done more good than bad in there. the latest bug I've been fighting, #4318, has taken quite some time, debug info posted on mantis etc, but this is as it seems not very important. What seems to be more important is fixing one's own bugs (oej gets 4 karma poits for fixing 3113 for "Finding and Fixing a Trivial Bug" and "markster says: Giving you this twice since it wasn't your bug (even if it was a brief fix)" and mentioning disclaimers (as in 3113 "Remembering to mention your disclaimer when you upload a patch"). It all looks like a face factor where the "good guys" get "karma" points for whatever they do and the "not-so-good- guys" get nothing. As with my own first -2 for 3331 that "only hung the box, needing it to be restarted onsite" if you started asterisk -cp and disconnected from the terminal... not a major bug by guidelines, some say, but I don't know.....

why don't you just ditch the whole karma bullshit and let the code speak for itself?

roy


_______________________________________________
Asterisk-Dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev





_______________________________________________
Asterisk-Dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev






_______________________________________________
Asterisk-Dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev


_______________________________________________
Asterisk-Dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev

Reply via email to