Re: [Asterisk-Dev] asterisk 'stable'?

Terry Wilson Wed, 14 Sep 2005 07:51:31 -0700

Odd, I've been using realtime for thousands of users with an average of many calls per second using realtime sip. Now, I don't use realtime extensions, which may be what you are talking about because I can't add contexts easily in realtime. Having to have a switch statement in a static file (which means a reload on adding a context) makes it non-realtime for our purposes. (And, last time I checked it still did the same query at least 3x in a row each time as a hold-over from the IAX switch, gah!)

On 9/13/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:

On Tue, 13 Sep 2005, Sherwood McGowan wrote:

> That's too simple mate, Asterisk RealTime.... use multiple servers with
> a common database interface for configurations. I personally like using
> MySQL clustering, but you could use whatever... Or, you could code your
> interface to allow for selecting what user is on a server by extension,
> area code, exchange, whatever. I already do this to a small degree and
> I'm working to make ARTCP (Asterisk RealTime Control Panel) have this
> functionality.
good luck scaling realtime to hundreds of channels.

realtime, as currently implemented, is very inefficient for high loads.

-alex

_______________________________________________
Asterisk-Dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev

_______________________________________________
Asterisk-Dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev

Re: [Asterisk-Dev] asterisk 'stable'?

Reply via email to