Yup. I wondered why the first couple releases of the ooH323c channel driver were named chan_h323 in conflict with asterisk/channels/h323.
It seems someone corrected the conflict, and I didn't notice. The INSTALL file doesn't note the change, and I had a working config from an earlier release, so I did not 'make samples'. Easy problem, easy fix. Thanks, Dan -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tzafrir Cohen Sent: Thursday, November 17, 2005 4:06 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Dev] Version 1.2.0 chan_h323 (ooh323c) On Thu, Nov 17, 2005 at 03:24:47PM -0800, Dan Austin wrote: > Has anyone tested this channel from the release versions of > asterisk-addons? > > It compiles fine, make install fails, but can be manually copied to the > modules > directory. I noticed the channel name has changed to chan_ooh323, so I > added it to modules.conf. For the record, chan_ooh323c from asterisk-addons is something completely different than chan_h323 from asterisk/channels/h323 . The latter requires the openh323 beast. -- Tzafrir Cohen icq#16849755 +972-50-7952406 [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.xorcom.com _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
