On Friday 03 March 2006 09:03, Tzafrir Cohen wrote: > On Tue, Feb 21, 2006 at 01:09:23PM -0600, Kevin P. Fleming wrote: > > Tzafrir Cohen wrote: > > > Is a span a better object for such actions or does chan_zap > > > (mainly/exclusivly) deals with channels? > > > > chan_zap does not really deal with Zaptel spans at all, just > > channels (and groups of channels). > > > > Changing chan_zap to handle channel addition/removal will be > > non-trivial, though; even handling non-contiguous channel > > numbering is less than optimal right now (everything is done > > using arrays). > > Your post has put me off for a while. Then I took a look at the > code and noticed that it actually uses linked lists mostly. > > So I decided to just feel lucky and add two CLI commands: 'zap > reload' to call setup_zap(1) and 'zap restart' to call setup_zap(0)
How is your first command different than simply calling 'reload chan_zap.so' ? -- Tilghman _______________________________________________ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-dev mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
