I need two things -- strict policy, and info about what patch would be
commited, if some issues would fixes, and what patch would not be
commited, and I doesn't need to spend my time for supporting this patches.
There is no answer to that question before the patch exists. We can
certainly tell you whether your idea seems like a good one and is likely
to be something we would accept, but until the actual patch appears
nobody can make any decisions about merging.
I probably shouldn't be getting in the middle of this, but it appears
the underlying root issue here is actually "closing/deleting an issue
without comments", and not necessarily the quality of a patch.
Since the arbitrary closing/deleting without comment issue has been
around for at least a couple of years, maybe that should be addressed by
the advisory council in the form of a policy or whatever.
Seems like most folks are fine with discussing the quality of a patch
via the irc channel, but that's not a substitute for arbitrary closings.
_______________________________________________
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
asterisk-dev mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
