Anton wrote: > There is a number of modules in fact, which are exist in the > binary form, and quite complicated to get them rebuilt or > updated to a new version, so if there is a way to keep > binary compatibility it should be kept.
I'm not aware of any other open source projects that attempt to preserve binary compatibility across major release versions. Certainly it is not the norm, and is an undue burden on the developers of the open source project to have to maintain compatibility for non-open-source modules. _______________________________________________ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-dev mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
