On Monday 06 November 2006 12:36, Dan Austin wrote: > 'Fixing' app_conference is a worthy endevour, but convincing > chan_iax to honor framing limits on both the send and receive > legs of a channel would be a big win. Even better would be > the addition of an IE to convey the desired framing/payload would > allow Asterisk and endpoints to 'negotiate' symmetric packetization. > Chan_skinny has that feature, and it greatly reduces the amount > of effort to make sure all devices are using identical values > for framing.
But it still is an issue. If a malicious attacker finds that you crash when a 50ms frame is submitted to your system, then you might be crashing all day. Sending someone a packet larger than they are expecting should never cause their system to crash. If it does, that's a bug on the receiving system. -- Tilghman _______________________________________________ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-dev mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
