In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Tilghman Lesher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wednesday 15 November 2006 12:32, Luigi Rizzo wrote: > > > I think they make this part of the code a lot more readable and > > > consistent and less error prone, especially because we can do the > > > same parsing on fields of the same type. > > While it certainly makes the code smaller, I don't find it easier to > read, nor do I think it's less error-prone. I think it's actually more > error prone, as it's difficult to read what the code is actually doing. > The problem is that this translation to macros makes the code > cryptic. I'd almost compare it to using macros for the sake of using > macros, not for any legitimate benefit.
I agree. When trying to understand code with lots of macros, I spend most of my time looking back at the macro definitions to understand what is actually going on! Cheers Tony -- Tony Mountifield Work: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.softins.co.uk Play: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://tony.mountifield.org _______________________________________________ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-dev mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
