On Fri, 17 Nov 2006, Luigi Rizzo wrote:

unfortunately, the way the code is now, it is non
trivial to implement tab completion at the middle of the string.
So don't expect this feature any time soon (at least not from me!)

If you are entertaining CLI ideas, how about a more "natural language" interface?

Changes have been implemented in 1.4, but they appear to be oriented more towards a developer than a user. The commands have been organized into categories that probably make sense to someone inside looking out while most users (and most CLI's) work from the outside looking in.

I agree that the 1.2 interface needed "improvement," but I think the 1.4 changes are in the wrong direction.

A command that follows:

        verb [adjective] noun

makes more sense to most users (my assumption) than:

        [category] object action

For example:

        show channels

seems more obvious and natural than:

        channel list

The 1.4 interface becomes more inconsistent when you add optional components. For example:

        show iax2 channels

versus

        iax2 list channel

Why does the addition of the category cause the action and object to switch places?

Another example. Only someone with a somewhat intimate knowledge of the code would know that "show translation" is a "core category" command and needs to be prefixed with the "core" keyword while "show parkedcalls" is not considered to be "core functionality" and cannot have the "core" prefix.

Not to belabor the 1.4 inconsistencies, but shouldn't the above 2 commands be "core translation show" and "parkedcalls show?"

From a usability standpoint, if I want asterisk to show me something, it
seems obvious to type "show" and press <TAB> to be presented with a list of my options. If I don't know how the option has been categorized, where do I start? Always with the "help" command? Or will the "help" command be categorized as "core" and follow the 1.4 interface ("core help core translation show") so we will have to know the answer before we can ask the question? :)

Many (most?) application CLI's follow "verb [adjective] noun". Why does Asterisk need to be different?

Thanks in advance,
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Steve Edwards      [EMAIL PROTECTED]      Voice: +1-760-468-3867 PST
Newline                                             Fax: +1-760-731-3000
_______________________________________________
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-dev mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev

Reply via email to