Russell Bryant wrote: > You're probably right. I'm starting to feel that the best thing to do > at this > point is to just make the way Asterisk does the matching not be completely > insane. The performance benefit is probably not worth trying to deal with > making such a significant change in the protocol, especially when there are > other ways to significantly improve the way it works in Asterisk without > doing > it. They may be harder to implement, but it's probably worth it. There > are way > too many existing Asterisk installations and now, other IAX2 > implementations, to > fight that battle.
Right on target :-) As a simple example, even keeping separate lists of private structures organized by peer IP address would a big win, although it interferes with the 'array of call numbers' model currently implemented in chan_iax2. _______________________________________________ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-dev mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
