Dear Jared; Who create the Makefile? Is it coming after I do the make command or it will be existed after extracting the tar.gz files?
Regards Bilal ----- Original Message ---- From: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [email protected] Sent: Friday, January 12, 2007 9:41:14 AM Subject: asterisk-dev Digest, Vol 30, Issue 24 Send asterisk-dev mailing list submissions to [email protected] To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to [EMAIL PROTECTED] You can reach the person managing the list at [EMAIL PROTECTED] When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of asterisk-dev digest..." Today's Topics: 1. Re: Queue Problem losing variables value on calls waiting (Andrea Cristofanini -- [Gedam Europe]) 2. Installation and Compilation (bilal ghayyad) 3. Out-of-band DTMF (Nitin Ahuja) 4. Re: Installation and Compilation (Tzafrir Cohen) 5. Re: Installation and Compilation (Jared Smith) 6. Re: rate_engine (serva) 7. Re: [svn-commits] file: trunk r1807 - /trunk/zaptel.c (Russell Bryant) 8. Re: [svn-commits] kpfleming: trunk r50538 - /trunk/main/channel.c (John Todd) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 21:41:49 +0100 From: "Andrea Cristofanini -- [Gedam Europe]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: [asterisk-dev] Queue Problem losing variables value on calls waiting To: Asterisk Developers Mailing List <[email protected]> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi list i have seen this problem : i use a dialer for outbound callcenter. I set callerid(name) to recordid for some reason. When the calls arrive in queue directly to an agent all is sweet when a call have to wait because the agents are busy, and then is sent to a agent again it loos the callerid(name) and set it to <unknown> PLS help!! -- Cheers Andrea Andrea Cristofanini Gedam Europe Srl Gedam Advanced Communication Ltd Torino, Italy C.so Re Umberto 21 Mobile : + 39 329 1871756 PSTN : + 39 011 19824516 FreeVoip: 6838601 http://www.gedameurope.com http://freevoip.gedameurope.com ------------------------------ Message: 2 Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 14:04:07 -0800 (PST) From: bilal ghayyad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: [asterisk-dev] Installation and Compilation To: [email protected] Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ascii Hi List; To create the symbolic link, I read in the documenation that I have to type this command: # ln -s /usr/src/'uname -r' /usr/src/linux-2.4 1) What it means by 'uname -r'? 2) Why I have to create such symbolic link to do pointing for the kernel? For what exctly will be used with asterisk? 3) What is the relation between creating such symbolic link and build directory? Any advise. Regards Bilal ____________________________________________________________________________________ Have a burning question? Go to www.Answers.yahoo.com and get answers from real people who know. ------------------------------ Message: 3 Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 14:54:54 -0800 From: "Nitin Ahuja" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: [asterisk-dev] Out-of-band DTMF To: <[email protected]> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Hi, I have a 3PCC (b2bua) that accepts calls from an Asterisk and sends them out to a proprietary mediaserver. The b2bua keeps itself in the SIP signaling path and needs to "listen" to the DTMF coming out of the Asterisk. I have configured the Asterisk with dtmfmode=info but the problem is that the mediaserver also needs to know about the DTMF and it cannot handle INFOs. As far as I could tell there is no way to do both rfc2833 and INFO for dtmf? Is it possible to do it via an app or AGI? If I wanted to add a new dtmfmode to do both what should I be looking at? Chan_sip.c or something else Thanks -n -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-dev/attachments/20070111/713b3144/attachment-0001.htm ------------------------------ Message: 4 Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 01:29:09 +0200 From: Tzafrir Cohen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: [asterisk-dev] Installation and Compilation To: [email protected] Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii First off: this is a is a questions for asterisk-users. Answering to there. On Thu, Jan 11, 2007 at 02:04:07PM -0800, bilal ghayyad wrote: > Hi List; > > To create the symbolic link, I read in the documenation that I have to type > this command: > > # ln -s /usr/src/'uname -r' /usr/src/linux-2.4 > > 1) What it means by 'uname -r'? `uname -r` The output of the command uname -r You kernel revision. Modules get loaded from /lib/modules/`uname -r` > 2) Why I have to create such symbolic link to do pointing for the kernel? For > what exctly will be used with asterisk? Actually those intructions are probably obsolete. What distribution do you use? Have you built your own kernel? What is the output of: ls -l /lib/modules/`uname -r`/build ls -l /lib/modules/`uname -r`/build/ Chances are you don't need that link. > 3) What is the relation between creating such symbolic link and build > directory? Check zaptel/Makefile: the build link is used. If it does not exist, the /usr/src dirs are used. -- Tzafrir Cohen icq#16849755 jabber:[EMAIL PROTECTED] +972-50-7952406 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.xorcom.com iax:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/tzafrir ------------------------------ Message: 5 Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 19:38:24 -0500 From: "Jared Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: [asterisk-dev] Installation and Compilation To: "Asterisk Developers Mailing List" <[email protected]> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed On 1/11/07, bilal ghayyad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > To create the symbolic link, I read in the documenation that I have to type > this command: > > # ln -s /usr/src/'uname -r' /usr/src/linux-2.4 > > 1) What it means by 'uname -r'? You've got it slightly wrong... it's `uname -r` (with back-ticks, not single quotes). The backticks cause the system to run "uname -r" and place the output there. The "uname -r" command returns the version number of the currently running kernel. > 2) Why I have to create such symbolic link to do pointing for the kernel? For > what exctly will be used with asterisk? Asterisk doesn't need it, but the Zaptel kernel drivers need to know where the kernel sources are, at least for the Linux 2.4 kernel. -Jared ------------------------------ Message: 6 Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 09:15:49 +0800 From: "serva" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: [asterisk-dev] rate_engine To: "Asterisk Developers Mailing List" <[email protected]>, "Asterisk Developers Mailing List" <[email protected]> Message-ID: <45A6E150.00538E.21350> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gb2312" HI,Ian Esper£¡ You can define a AST_MODULE yourself that you can compile asteisk-1.4.Like #define AST_MODULE "ael". ======= 2007-01-11 23:44:02 FROM YOUR LAST LETTER£º======= >Hi, > >I'm trying to port rate_engine to aserisk-1.4 and I getting this error > >error: 'AST_MODULE' undeclared here (not in a function) > >I'm compiling it external. with it's own Makefile. > >What should I do? >-- >_______________________________________________ >--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- > >asterisk-dev mailing list >To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev > = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = ¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡Ö Àñ£¡ ¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡serva [EMAIL PROTECTED] ¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡2007-01-12 ------------------------------ Message: 7 Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 22:35:19 -0500 From: Russell Bryant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: [asterisk-dev] Re: [svn-commits] file: trunk r1807 - /trunk/zaptel.c To: Asterisk Developers Mailing List <[email protected]> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" [email protected] wrote: > Author: file > Date: Thu Jan 11 11:07:38 2007 > New Revision: 1807 > > URL: http://svn.digium.com/view/zaptel?view=rev&rev=1807 > Log: > Return what I took away (fcstab) since it's actually required for some > instances... (issue #8792 reported by tootai) If we make the zaptel configure script check for it to make sure that it is supported, we can use the "unused" attribute on this to eliminate the compiler warning for the cases where it isn't needed. static __u16 fcstab[256] __attribute__ ((unused)) = ... -- Russell Bryant Software Engineer Digium, Inc. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: russell.vcf Type: text/x-vcard Size: 278 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-dev/attachments/20070111/1489581a/russell-0001.vcf ------------------------------ Message: 8 Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 22:39:47 -0800 From: John Todd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: [asterisk-dev] Re: [svn-commits] kpfleming: trunk r50538 - /trunk/main/channel.c To: [email protected] Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" While I understand the sentiment here, I'm not sure this is a good idea. This builds in a 500ms post-dial delay issue into every call. I've been building systems for three years now, and everywhere there is an "Answer" (which, I believe, should be the only method that picks up a line and sets up a media channel locally, but that's a discussion for another thread) there is a "Wait(.5)" or even a "Wait(1)". Building this in as a non-optional default seems a bit on the drastic side to deal with people who don't know about how to manage their dialplans. Perhaps making this a selectable option, or removing it and better educating folks how to write a dialplan that has better audio performance? There are instances where instant audio path access is useful. If I'm using DTMF to page through ChanSpy sessions, as an example, is this called? How about during large test jig configurations where thousands of audio channels are being set up/torn down in short order? (which, BTW, will be happening next week on a grand scale hopefully.) It just seems "wrong" to me to insert a mandatory delay. I know the intentions are good, but hard-coded things like this make me uncomfortable. Discussion? JT >Author: kpfleming >Date: Thu Jan 11 17:42:14 2007 >New Revision: 50538 > >URL: http://svn.digium.com/view/asterisk?view=rev&rev=50538 >Log: >when a channel gets automatically answered by an application, sleep >a bit to give the audio path (for VOIP channels) time to be setup > >Modified: > trunk/main/channel.c > >Modified: trunk/main/channel.c >URL: >http://svn.digium.com/view/asterisk/trunk/main/channel.c?view=diff&rev=50538&r1=50537&r2=50538 >============================================================================== >--- trunk/main/channel.c (original) >+++ trunk/main/channel.c Thu Jan 11 17:42:14 2007 >@@ -1615,17 +1615,21 @@ > int ast_answer(struct ast_channel *chan) > { > int res = 0; >+ > ast_channel_lock(chan); >+ > /* You can't answer an outbound call */ > if (ast_test_flag(chan, AST_FLAG_OUTGOING)) { > ast_channel_unlock(chan); > return 0; > } >+ > /* Stop if we're a zombie or need a soft hangup */ > if (ast_test_flag(chan, AST_FLAG_ZOMBIE) || ast_check_hangup(chan)) { > ast_channel_unlock(chan); > return -1; > } >+ > switch(chan->_state) { > case AST_STATE_RINGING: > case AST_STATE_RING: >@@ -1633,6 +1637,7 @@ > res = chan->tech->answer(chan); > ast_setstate(chan, AST_STATE_UP); > ast_cdr_answer(chan->cdr); >+ ast_safe_sleep(chan, 500); > break; > case AST_STATE_UP: > ast_cdr_answer(chan->cdr); >@@ -1640,7 +1645,9 @@ > default: > break; > } >+ > ast_channel_unlock(chan); >+ > return res; > } > > >_______________________________________________ ------------------------------ _______________________________________________ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-dev mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev End of asterisk-dev Digest, Vol 30, Issue 24 ******************************************** ____________________________________________________________________________________ The fish are biting. Get more visitors on your site using Yahoo! Search Marketing. http://searchmarketing.yahoo.com/arp/sponsoredsearch_v2.php _______________________________________________ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-dev mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
