On Sunday, 6 בMay 2007 01:40, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
> On Sun, May 06, 2007 at 12:52:49AM +0300, Oron Peled wrote:
> > int sync_election(struct zt_span *span, int priority);
>
> This currently happens implicitly in zt_alarm_notify . When there is an
> alarm on the master span, relections happen.
>
> Should the two be separated?
Yes, for two reasons:
1. Alarm may have other consequences (e.g: current calls disconnection).
2. The explicit API include a priority parameter. For example, a PRI
driver that got disconnected from the network may now have lower
priority than before, but it may still be better than ztdummy if
it has a good internal clock.
--
Oron Peled Voice/Fax: +972-4-8228492
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.actcom.co.il/~oron
ICQ UIN: 16527398
But it does move!
-- Galileo Galilei
_______________________________________________
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
asterisk-dev mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
