So what your saying is that my ultimate goal (2 ip's on different networks) is obtainable; but that I should be looking into my route table and not Asterisk, am I following correctly? I wasn't able to find a bug report indicating this behavior, do you think this is something I should open for review? -Thanks, _Chris On 5/5/07, Tilghman Lesher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Saturday 05 May 2007, Sergey Okhapkin wrote: > > Yes, it's the expected IP stack behavior when the service is bound to > > 0.0.0.0. Asterisk sends the repy to the address from which the request > > came, it has no control which src address to use. > > Actually, it does control it; it uses the Linux routing map to select which > address it uses as its source address. There has been a request for > some time to allow Asterisk to reply on the same address on which it > received packets, but I don't know that there's been any successful > patch so far. You're certainly welcome to add your efforts to getting > Asterisk to do that, though. > > -- > Tilghman > _______________________________________________ > --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- > > asterisk-dev mailing list > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev > -- ------ Christopher T Aloi ------
-- ------ Christopher T Aloi ------ _______________________________________________ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-dev mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
