> Personally I like chan_bluetooth. I don't think chan_mobile really > describes what it does. Chan mobile does not make me think "i'll use my > bluetooth hand set with this asterisk channel". > > As far as the channel driver suporting other technologies in the future, > we could just rename it then (and have this lengthy discussion again). >
Personally I like chan_mobile because it covers all the bases that this driver will cover in the not too distant future. When I think chan_mobile I think hey this will support my mobil device, whatever it happens to be. Calling it by a name of what it currently supports makes no sense, if in a few months it will just have to be renamed anyways. Doing so will just add more confusion. If I hadn't happen to read this thread I would still be looking for chan_cellphone. -- Michael Cargile Explido Software USA Inc. http://www.explido.us _______________________________________________ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-dev mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
