On Sun, Jun 10, 2007 at 01:37:32AM -0500, Pari Nannapaneni wrote:
> > Wouldn't adding these commands defeat the intent of the http server in
> > Asterisk? The intent, as I understand it, is to be lightweight, to
> > shift all of the complexity of the configuration into the browser, so the
> > Asterisk process isn't spending time doing string processing for the manager
> > interface (and thus properly spends its time on call processing).
>
> Short version:
>
> agreed, lets comeback to this topic when we have some one _actually_
> using the gui for 400+ users and complains about performance.
Have you tested the impact?
I can speculate that this would lead to the GUI making Asterisk traverse
the list of contexts too many times and hence performance degragation
under certain circumstances. Or at least for the sake of argument.
--
Tzafrir Cohen
icq#16849755 jabber:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
+972-50-7952406 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.xorcom.com iax:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/tzafrir
_______________________________________________
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
asterisk-dev mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
