Hello, In the mentioned thread in this list I told about the check on p->owner. Look here: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-dev/2007-June/027989.html You changed this in your branch. The branch works, my colleague made a short test regarding the missed calls. But as also told trunk is no choice for my office. We need a stable Bristuffed-Asterisk and so I backported your changes to our rock-solid Asterisk 1.2. I know Asterisk-developers don't like that. In the feature I plan to upgrade to Asterisk 1.6. But it has to be stable and there have to be a Bristuffed version, cause I need the card-drivers.
Gunnar Thursday, June 21, 2007, 10:07:16 PM, you wrote: > Yes, this is my code. But please check out the branch and try it out > instead of sending > out random patches. I've worked with Frank Sautter who has been > helping me test > this and I have implemented other changes since the code you send out. > Getting feedback is important. If you change the code to work and not > contribute back > to me, how should I know that it's wrong in your network? > Please test the branch and provide me with patches, feedback. Thanks. > /O > _______________________________________________ > --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- > asterisk-dev mailing list > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev _______________________________________________ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-dev mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
