On Tue, Jul 10, 2007 at 02:52:32PM -0300, Paulo Garcia wrote: > Hi All, > > After some research I decided to patch the ztdummy to provide the clock > source for Asterisk.
Please help test http://bugs.digium.com/8896 It is essentially qhat you describe. > > Now, I'm wondering with a scenario where I have my card and another vendor > card (e.g. Digium or Sangoma). How the clock will work in this situation? > The true-zaptel-card (Digium or Sangoma) will "overwrite" my patched ztdummy > and use its own clock? Is there a way to my clock have high priority in this > case? The patch there also adds the option 'prefmaster' to ztdummy. This will make ztdummy try to take the sync mastership "by force" when it loads. However a digital span can still take timing on certain circumstnaces if it is configured as a timing source. But then again, in setups where you're supposed to provide timing, no other device should be a timing source (a value other that '0' for the 'timing' parameter in the span= line in ztcfg). -- Tzafrir Cohen icq#16849755 jabber:[EMAIL PROTECTED] +972-50-7952406 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.xorcom.com iax:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/tzafrir _______________________________________________ --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com-- asterisk-dev mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
