On Fri, 05 Oct 2007 10:29:22 +0200, Klaus Darilion wrote: > I tried OW 2.1 but it crashed really often. But the release candidate > looks more stable (not heavily tested yet).
OW 2.1 release did crash, but if you've been tracking the commits to the 2.1 branch in subversion, they have cleaned up a lot of the crashes. i havent yet tested 2.2 in any large or proper scale, but initial reports does show that its much more stable. -- Regards, /\_/\ "All dogs go to heaven." [EMAIL PROTECTED] (0 0) http://www.openmalaysiablog.com/ +==========================----oOO--(_)--OOo----==========================+ | for a in past present future; do | | for b in clients employers associates relatives neighbours pets; do | | echo "The opinions here in no way reflect the opinions of my $a $b." | | done; done | +=========================================================================+ _______________________________________________ --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com-- asterisk-dev mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
