> On Dec. 24, 2013, 8:48 a.m., Joshua Colp wrote: > > /branches/12/main/http.c, lines 661-662 > > <https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3092/diff/1/?file=49943#file49943line661> > > > > This is incorrect.
/me blushes - David ----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3092/#review10491 ----------------------------------------------------------- On Dec. 23, 2013, 5:09 p.m., David Lee wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3092/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated Dec. 23, 2013, 5:09 p.m.) > > > Review request for Asterisk Developers. > > > Bugs: ASTERISK-22486 > https://issues.asterisk.org/jira/browse/ASTERISK-22486 > > > Repository: Asterisk > > > Description > ------- > > Asterisk does not support any of the transfer encodings specified in > HTTP/1.1, other than the default "identity" encoding. > > According to RFC 2616: > > A server which receives an entity-body with a transfer-coding it does > not understand SHOULD return 501 (Unimplemented), and close the > connection. A server MUST NOT send transfer-codings to an HTTP/1.0 > client. > > This patch adds the 501 Unimplemented response, instead of the hard work > of actually implementing other recordings. > > This behavior is especially problematic for Node.js clients, which use > chunked encoding by default. > > > Diffs > ----- > > /branches/12/main/http.c 404552 > > Diff: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3092/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > HTTP requests using Node.js > > > Thanks, > > David Lee > >
-- _____________________________________________________________________ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-dev mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
