----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3225/#review10918 -----------------------------------------------------------
Ship it! Ship It! - Nitesh Bansal On Feb. 14, 2014, 9:45 a.m., Nitesh Bansal wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3225/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated Feb. 14, 2014, 9:45 a.m.) > > > Review request for Asterisk Developers. > > > Bugs: ASTERISK-23279 > https://issues.asterisk.org/jira/browse/ASTERISK-23279 > > > Repository: Asterisk > > > Description > ------- > > Scenario: > Asterisk sends the INVITE proposing alaw and telephone-event, it proposes > rtpmap:101 for telephone-event. > Peer responds with 2xx, it answers with alaw and telephone-event also, but it > proposes a different rtpmap number(rtpmap:103) for telephone-event. > > Expected Behaviour: Asterisk should honour the rtpmapping in the response and > send DTMF packets using 103 as payload type for DTMF. > > Actual Behaviour: Asterisk sends DTMF packets using payload type 101. > > > Diffs > ----- > > http://svn.asterisk.org/svn/asterisk/branches/11/main/rtp_engine.c 408068 > > Diff: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3225/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > > Thanks, > > Nitesh Bansal > >
-- _____________________________________________________________________ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-dev mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
