On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 11:23 AM, David M. Lee <[email protected]> wrote: > On Feb 27, 2014, at 3:05 PM, Jared Smith <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 3:51 PM, Tzafrir Cohen <[email protected]> > wrote: >> >> This is funny. In 11 pjproject is bundled (though patching it out is not >> an issue). In 12 it is not included in the tree anymore. > > > I know, and the humor isn't lost on me. :-) That being said, I'm hoping to > get the Asterisk fork of pjproject packaged up in Fedora/EPEL shortly, so > that we can begin getting Asterisk 12 packaged. > > > Now that PJSIP 2.2 have been released, I hope to update our fork shortly. > > Since all of our patches were either accepted upstream, or backported from > trunk, I hope that means that the Asterisk fork will be identical to the > PJSIP 2.2 release. > So, obviously question. Are we letting our fork die and moving directly to the 2.2 release (Please say yes, please say yes).
-- Paul Belanger | PolyBeacon, Inc. Jabber: [email protected] | IRC: pabelanger (Freenode) Github: https://github.com/pabelanger | Twitter: https://twitter.com/pabelanger -- _____________________________________________________________________ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-dev mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
