----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3318/#review11279 -----------------------------------------------------------
/team/group/media_formats-reviewed/bridges/bridge_softmix.c <https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3318/#comment20902> And now this shows why you added that property. Since whether or not the marker bit is set isn't really specific to video, it does feel like this should be a more generic property. It does feel like this a bleed over of RTP into generic frames, which feels ugly... but I'm not sure how else we would represent this either. - Matt Jordan On March 8, 2014, 11:35 a.m., Joshua Colp wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3318/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated March 8, 2014, 11:35 a.m.) > > > Review request for Asterisk Developers. > > > Repository: Asterisk > > > Description > ------- > > These changes move the bridges over to the new media formats API. > > > Diffs > ----- > > /team/group/media_formats-reviewed/bridges/bridge_softmix.c 409286 > /team/group/media_formats-reviewed/bridges/bridge_simple.c 409286 > /team/group/media_formats-reviewed/bridges/bridge_holding.c 409286 > > Diff: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3318/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > > Thanks, > > Joshua Colp > >
-- _____________________________________________________________________ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-dev mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
