-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3534/#review11909
-----------------------------------------------------------

Ship it!


Ship It!

- rmudgett


On May 13, 2014, 6:11 a.m., one47 wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3534/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated May 13, 2014, 6:11 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Asterisk Developers.
> 
> 
> Repository: Asterisk
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Regression probably introduced when chan_dahdi was refactored in Asterisk 
> 1.8. If waitfordialtone=nnn is enabled in chan_dahdi.conf, the dialtone is 
> never detected. Once that is fixed, the dial still did not proceed. Patch 
> attached to 1) Allow dsp to operate early enough to detect the dialtone if 
> required 2) test the right variable to determine that dialtone has been 
> detected.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   /tags/1.8.27.0/channels/chan_dahdi.c 413786 
> 
> Diff: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3534/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Dial using Sangoma Analogue card before and after patch, with 
> waitfordialtone=3000 set.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> one47
> 
>

-- 
_____________________________________________________________________
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-dev mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev

Reply via email to