-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3567/#review11968
-----------------------------------------------------------



/tags/11.9.0/channels/chan_unistim.c
<https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3567/#comment21880>

    How about simply moving the unlock up 4 lines. One unlock is better than 
two.


Furthermore, we generally patch the branches, not the tags. (Tags are immutable 
by convention.)

You should patch /branches/11.

- wdoekes


On May 27, 2014, 8:32 a.m., Peter Whisker wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3567/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated May 27, 2014, 8:32 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Asterisk Developers and Igor Goncharovsky.
> 
> 
> Bugs: ASTERISK-23792
>     https://issues.asterisk.org/jira/browse/ASTERISK-23792
> 
> 
> Repository: Asterisk
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> There is a conditional exit from a mutexed area of code which does not unlock 
> before the return.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   /tags/11.9.0/channels/chan_unistim.c 414555 
> 
> Diff: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3567/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Inspection and build
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Peter Whisker
> 
>

-- 
_____________________________________________________________________
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-dev mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev

Reply via email to