-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3818/#review12703
-----------------------------------------------------------

Ship it!


No problem with doing this.  Not many people have had the joy of working with 
the old object code.

- rmudgett


On July 16, 2014, 6:40 p.m., Corey Farrell wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3818/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated July 16, 2014, 6:40 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Asterisk Developers.
> 
> 
> Repository: Asterisk
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> This flags astobj.h as deprecated, warns people to use astobj2.h instead.  
> After 3758 and 3759 are committed the only thing that will still use astobj.h 
> is netsock.c, and that is already deprecated.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   /trunk/include/asterisk/astobj.h 418788 
> 
> Diff: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3818/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Corey Farrell
> 
>

-- 
_____________________________________________________________________
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-dev mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev

Reply via email to