----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3952/#review13197 -----------------------------------------------------------
Ship it! I think this is a great addition. A side note for the archives: I always wanted to do this with an array of IP addresses to get some sort of load sharing. In my John Todd Dragster tests a few years ago the limiting factor was the gigabit ethernet interface. What if we could split the load between multiple interfaces? - Olle E Johansson On Aug. 27, 2014, 9:44 p.m., Paul Belanger wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3952/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated Aug. 27, 2014, 9:44 p.m.) > > > Review request for Asterisk Developers. > > > Repository: Asterisk > > > Description > ------- > > Users now have the ability to bind the rtpengine instance to a specific IP > address. For example, you want chan_sip (call control) on eth0 but rtp > (media) on eth1. > > > Diffs > ----- > > trunk/configs/samples/sip.conf.sample 422198 > trunk/channels/chan_sip.c 422198 > trunk/CHANGES 422198 > > Diff: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3952/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > kamailio proxy with rtpengine. Multihomed asterisk system. > > > Thanks, > > Paul Belanger > >
-- _____________________________________________________________________ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-dev mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
