-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3971/#review13318
-----------------------------------------------------------

Ship it!


Ship It!

- Corey Farrell


On Sept. 16, 2014, 2:15 p.m., rmudgett wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3971/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Sept. 16, 2014, 2:15 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Asterisk Developers.
> 
> 
> Bugs: AFS-155 and ASTERISK-24295
>     https://issues.asterisk.org/jira/browse/AFS-155
>     https://issues.asterisk.org/jira/browse/ASTERISK-24295
> 
> 
> Repository: Asterisk
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> * Make astob2 REF_DEBUG output an invalid object line when an invalid ao2 
> object ref/unref is attempted.  This is similar to the constructor/destructor 
> lines.
> 
> * Fixed refcounter.py to handle skewed objects that have 
> constructor/destructor states.
> 
> * Made refcounter.py highlight the invalid ao2 object refs by putting them in 
> their own section of the processed output file.
> 
> * Made refcounter.py highlight unreffing an object by more than one that 
> results in a negative ref count and the object being destroyed.  The 
> abnormally destroyed object is reported in the invalid and finalized object 
> sections of the output.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   /branches/1.8/main/astobj2.c 423191 
>   /branches/1.8/contrib/scripts/refcounter.py 423191 
> 
> Diff: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/3971/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Instigated a REF_DEBUG log that reffed destroyed objects to get an invalid 
> line in the ref debug log file.
> The patched script doesn't have an excpetion on a previous invalid ref debug 
> log that had code unreffing a destroyed object.
> The patched script now highlights the invalid objects in the log.
> 
> Tested unreffing a newly created object by two and then unreffing the object 
> again.  The abnormally destroyed object is reported in the invalid and 
> finalized sections with an additional log line indicating that the object was 
> destroyed abnormally.  The next unref is reported as an unref of an invalid 
> object.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> rmudgett
> 
>

-- 
_____________________________________________________________________
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-dev mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev

Reply via email to