On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 09:02:24PM -0500, Matthew Jordan wrote: > On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 4:31 PM, George Joseph <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 1:48 PM, Matthew Jordan <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > >> "And there was much rejoicing" > >> > >> To summarize: > >> * A comparison of management platforms has been done. Barring a giant > >> catastrophe or some insane limitation, we're going to go simple here and > >> stick with gitolite. Reasoning is on the wiki page. > >> > > > > The only thing I'd suggest is to use CGit instead of gitweb for the web > > interface. It's got richer capabilities and works great with gitolite. > > Once it's initially configured you don't ever have to touch it. > > > > > > CGit does look a lot better. Wiki page updated!
Adding my +1 for cgit. http://git.kernel.org switched to it awhile ago and it's right up there on my list of easy-to-read C source too. That's got to count for something. :) -- Shaun Ruffell Digium, Inc. | Linux Kernel Developer 445 Jan Davis Drive NW - Huntsville, AL 35806 - USA Check us out at: www.digium.com & www.asterisk.org -- _____________________________________________________________________ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-dev mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
