George Joseph wrote:


    5. The idea of higher level concept configuration has been thrown
    around as something to make this easier. I personally think this
    sort of thing belongs there. A type=trunk, itsp, phone, etc. Lower
    level blocks remain the same and additional logic on top can be
    added to handle this sort of thing.

Are you thinking like users.conf?  I thought you guys wanted that to die
a horrible death. :)   Seriously though, are you thinking along the
lines of a new composite pjsip configuration object that creates the
base objects behind the scenes?   If so, that'd solve a lot and I could
start working on it right now.  I just thought you guys were shying away
from these types of things.

As base objects it's a bad idea. As a single object to rule them all (a user) it's also a complicated/bad idea. As higher level concepts which represent things that people are familiar with they're fine.

Joshua Colp
Digium, Inc. | Senior Software Developer
445 Jan Davis Drive NW - Huntsville, AL 35806 - US
Check us out at: &

-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by --

asterisk-dev mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:

Reply via email to