----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4049/#review13461 -----------------------------------------------------------
/branches/1.8/res/res_fax.c <https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4049/#comment23986> I can't seem to find where the reserved session is actually linked into the faxregistry container. Have you verified that everything is properly balanced in the ref logs with this patch? - opticron On Oct. 5, 2014, 10:10 p.m., Corey Farrell wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4049/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated Oct. 5, 2014, 10:10 p.m.) > > > Review request for Asterisk Developers. > > > Bugs: ASTERISK-24392 > https://issues.asterisk.org/jira/browse/ASTERISK-24392 > > > Repository: Asterisk > > > Description > ------- > > Reserved fax gateway sessions are added to faxregistry.container, then added > again when the session is 'really' created. It seems that when it is > re-added it adds a second reference into the container due to the id being > different. Removal of the original list entry is not successful. This > prevents the session from ever being unallocated. > > > Diffs > ----- > > /branches/1.8/res/res_fax.c 424175 > > Diff: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/4049/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > Verified this resolves the leak in 11 and 12. > > > Thanks, > > Corey Farrell > >
-- _____________________________________________________________________ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-dev mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
