I make use of a couple patches so the latest Fedora spec is a good enough base for me. If other people want to see current binaries for EPEL hopefully they'll speak up. I had a chance to look over the asterisk.spec from Fedora master, I have a couple comments.
* res_ari_mailboxes.so should be moved to the asterisk-mwi-external sub-package. It has always depended on res_stasis_mailboxes but that wasn't listed in menuselect until very recently. * I don't like that the config files are split across sub-packages. Having a dedicated sub-package for all configs makes it easier to have another package (like a web gui) provide /etc/asterisk. This would also make it easier to have a config package for "Super Awesome Company". I realize this comment is unlikely to go anywhere, but had to mention it anyways. On Tuesday, November 24, 2015, Jared Smith <jaredsm...@jaredsmith.net> wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 9:24 PM, Leif Madsen <leif.mad...@avoxi.com > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','leif.mad...@avoxi.com');>> wrote: > >> The way it works is that major versions of Asterisk (and same with other >> packages) are associated with specific releases of Fedora and RHEL, which >> means the major versions are "stuck" to those releases. > > > > If it's easier, I'd be happy to setup some repositories for newer versions > of Asterisk on RHEL/CentOS 6 and RHEL/CentOS 7. > > -- > Jared Smith >
-- _____________________________________________________________________ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-dev mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev