> On 25 Feb 2017, at 19:35, George Joseph <gjos...@digium.com> wrote:
>
> No hurry but since the git migration and the availability of GitHub, do we
> really need to keep the team branches at all?
An important aspect for me with all my subversion branches was that all the
code was contributed under
the license agreement for Digium to use. I also got a lot of help maintaining
them with the automatic
tools that was implemented in subversion, where, as an example, I got email
when things broke and did not
merge automatically. This made it possible to maintain a large amount of
branches.
With those tools gone I don’t benefit as much from using the central repository
and no one else
seems to bother about the licensing part either, which I felt was important.
I haven’t found a new home for all my patches, so please keep them somewhere.
Most of them
are in daily use with many large service providers over the world. I get
feedback on their use
all the time. To me it feels like they’re an important part of code for the
community, regardless
if they are integrated into the core distribution or not.
Thank you.
/O
--
_____________________________________________________________________
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
asterisk-dev mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
