Le 2017-09-07 à 14:02, Dan Jenkins a écrit :
[...]
This is good to see and something close to what we talked about at
astridevcon last year
Yes i remember ;). But i also remember some people want to use
differents bus to do that. We are only focus on rabbitmq.
- Asterisk providing a means into ARI from somewhere other than
Websocket/HTTP - which would enable scaling - back then I was talking
about wanting to push in the ARI Proxy inside the project but this
seems like a good middle ground.
We did the the same for AMI, but we think it's better to have this
features directly in Asterisk. If your proxy is down you need to deal
with this. If Asterisk is down, everything is down, so you don't care
about your messages.
I'll be interested to hear more and what restrictions there are and
how you'd interact with it.
What king of restriction are you thinking? For interactions, are you
talking about our product?
Sylvain
--
_____________________________________________________________________
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
asterisk-dev mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
