BTW: I'm not really happy with the fact, that an existing LTS / stable
version gets a new pjsip version "on the fly". From my point of view,
this should have been done
during a normal development cycle and not during a stable phase.
Since support for bundled PJSIP we've actively tried to keep up to date, so
that we don't end up managing a fork and backporting a lot of patches. This has
worked well for us and we haven't seen any problems - in fact we've gained some
stability at times. If this is a problem in PJSIP this would be the first time
we've encountered a regression. If people feel that we should instead lock
versions then this is certainly something we can discuss. What do others think?
Hi,
I think staying up to date with the latest version is better than
locking in on some version mainly for the reason of manageability and risk.
Upgrading from an 'older' release (skipping a few releases) involves a
greater risk than updating to the next minor immediately
because less changes need to be checked and integrated. The risk of
breaking something "not obvious" is simply smaller.
Best regards,
Andreas
--
_____________________________________________________________________
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
asterisk-dev mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
