On Wed, Jul 8, 2020 at 8:29 AM Joshua C. Colp <jc...@sangoma.com> wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 8, 2020 at 10:24 AM Dan Jenkins <d...@nimblea.pe> wrote: >> >> YES YES YES. > > > I'm sorry, I didn't quite hear you. Did you say "no"? :D > >> >> I never really got why it was done like it was... > > > Yeah, I don't really recall why either. I think it originates from a time > where we were still early to testing and didn't have confidence in things as > much, still finding our footing. > >> >> I agree, 4-6 weeks is good. If someone's going to take the time to upgrade >> to an 18 RC then they'll be looking to test it and give feedback etc etc so >> you don't need a huge amount of time... just enough to actually action bug >> fixes and then release new RCs with those bug fixes > > > Indeed. Even before cutting the RC we'll be testing it and such too.
This sounds like a good idea and definitely removes some of the complications around keeping branches in sync at that time. I'd be a fan of the 6 weeks side of things for major releases. Just my .02. Matthew Fredrickson > > -- > Joshua C. Colp > Asterisk Technical Lead > Sangoma Technologies > Check us out at www.sangoma.com and www.asterisk.org > -- > _____________________________________________________________________ > -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- > > asterisk-dev mailing list > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev -- Matthew Fredrickson Digium - A Sangoma Company | Director of Open Source Software Development 445 Jan Davis Drive NW - Huntsville, AL 35806 - USA -- _____________________________________________________________________ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-dev mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
