On Sun, Dec 13, 2020 at 1:57 AM Ahmed Fouad <afo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi, > > I've a situation with remote attended transfer and like to solve it by > putting the 2nd channel in the bridge in UNHOLD state when swapping is > completed. > I started debugging the code with res_pjsip_refer.c: INVITE with Replaces > being attempted. > > I'm running Asterisk certified/16.8-cert3 > > [Dec 12 12:03:20] DEBUG[10736] res_pjsip_refer.c: INVITE with Replaces > being attempted. 'PJSIP/XXXX-00000011' --> 'PJSIP/XXXX-0000000e' > [Dec 12 12:03:20] DEBUG[14235] bridge_channel.c: Bridge > 883a1d4a-580d-470d-8448-90b2a03b637b: 0x7f305403c998(PJSIP/XXXX-00000011) > is joining > [Dec 12 12:03:20] DEBUG[14235] bridge_channel.c: Bridge > 883a1d4a-580d-470d-8448-90b2a03b637b: pushing > 0x7f305403c998(PJSIP/XXXX-00000011) by swapping with > 0x7f305408bea8(PJSIP/XXXX-0000000e) > [Dec 12 12:03:20] DEBUG[14235] bridge_channel.c: Setting > 0x7f305408bea8(PJSIP/XXXX-0000000e) state from:0 to:2 > [Dec 12 12:03:20] DEBUG[14235] bridge_channel.c: Bridge > 883a1d4a-580d-470d-8448-90b2a03b637b: pulling > 0x7f305408bea8(PJSIP/XXXX-0000000e) > [Dec 12 12:03:20] VERBOSE[14235] bridge_channel.c: Channel > PJSIP/XXXX-0000000e left 'simple_bridge' basic-bridge > <883a1d4a-580d-470d-8448-90b2a03b637b> > [Dec 12 12:03:20] DEBUG[14235] bridge_channel.c: Bridge > 883a1d4a-580d-470d-8448-90b2a03b637b: 0x7f305408bea8(PJSIP/XXXX-0000000e) > is leaving simple_bridge technology > [Dec 12 12:03:20] VERBOSE[14235] bridge_channel.c: Channel > PJSIP/XXXX-00000011 swapped with PJSIP/XXXX-0000000e into 'simple_bridge' > basic-bridge <883a1d4a-580d-470d-8448-90b2a03b637b> > [Dec 12 12:03:20] DEBUG[14235] bridge_native_rtp.c: Bridge > '883a1d4a-580d-470d-8448-90b2a03b637b'. Checking compatability for > channels '*PJSIP/pstn-0000000f*' and 'PJSIP/XXXX-00000011' > > In this step I'd like to make sure that the other channel > *PJSIP/pstn-0000000f* in the bridge is off hold or put it off-hold. > > How can I accomplish it > ? > I believe such things should already happen[1], but if I recall you posted on the community forum about other code modifications[2]. Have you done changes in the SDP side? Otherwise you'd need to show exactly what is happening. [1] https://github.com/asterisk/asterisk/blob/certified/16.8/main/bridge.c#L4779 [2] https://community.asterisk.org/t/chan-pjsip-add-support-for-passing-hold-and-unhold-requests-through/86738 -- Joshua C. Colp Asterisk Technical Lead Sangoma Technologies Check us out at www.sangoma.com and www.asterisk.org
-- _____________________________________________________________________ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-dev mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
