Greetings all, Sean Bright brought up on IRC the removal of configure from git. This may be impactful since some users (not necessarily developers) may not understand the build system when building from branches (not tags or releases) and become confused when configure is not present which is why I disagreed with doing so on IRC. I'm curious though what others think of such a change. I think to be acceptable it would need:
1. To regenerate configure if configure.ac has been changed, so that developers don't have a stale configure 2. To provide instructions if configure is not present and "make" is run, I'm on the fence on automatically running it 3. Releases (and tags) would need to have a generated configure in them Thoughts? -- Joshua C. Colp Asterisk Project Lead Sangoma Technologies Check us out at www.sangoma.com and www.asterisk.org
-- _____________________________________________________________________ -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com -- asterisk-dev mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
