On 6/27/2023 7:29 AM, Joshua C. Colp wrote:
On Tue, Jun 27, 2023 at 8:22 AM <aster...@phreaknet.org <mailto:aster...@phreaknet.org>> wrote:

<snip>


    Trace from an "unavailable" ATA (not working correctly):
    https://paste.interlinked.us/iz07sapwrb.txt

    Trace from an "available" ATA (working correctly):
    https://paste.interlinked.us/ocutyjslmg.txt


The "unavailable" ATA no longer has a working TLS connection to Asterisk, resulting in OPTIONS failing, and going unreachable, and eventually the Contact going away. Actually examining the TLS side would be needed.

Thanks, Josh. Further troubleshooting supports that as being the problem as well. I'll have to figure out what's changed with that.

Replying to the dev list since this is not directly related, but it reminds me of a previous conversation we had about chan_pjsip automatically using the transport used for registration. This is not currently done; what would be your thoughts on perhaps adding an option to do this automatically? Currently, the provisioning system directs devices to the proper port based on the security options in the system and the TLS capabilities of the device. When something registers, I keep track of the port on which a device registers using AMI, logging it to a database. We have one port for UDP, one for TLS 1.0, and one for TLS 1.2 (none for plain TCP at the moment). chan_sip isn't as flexible so the process is more straightforward there: just use the TLS 1.0 port if TLS is enabled, but for PJSIP, the transpiler assigns a transport based on the registration port. In theory, a client can toggle the transport for registration (TLS vs UDP), but that alone doesn't really work since pjsip.conf needs to be in agreement with that. It would be slightly more seamless if it could just sync up somehow, as right now I have to manually retranspile any time this occurs, and it seems kind of clunky to have to do all this for transports to work properly.

Would there be any consideration or problem with potentially doing something like this? After all, it seems like there's a 1:1 mapping and it should be fairly straightforward. Kind of like the "line" option for registrations, it would help in making things "just work" more of the time...

--
_____________________________________________________________________
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-dev mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev

Reply via email to