On 10/9/2023 5:11 AM, Joshua C. Colp wrote:
On Wed, Sep 27, 2023 at 6:31 PM <aster...@phreaknet.org <mailto:aster...@phreaknet.org>> wrote:

    On 9/27/2023 5:26 PM, Andrew Latham wrote:
    > I would have to look deeper again but my kneejerk was this
    sounds like
    > "nightly" to me. Just chiming in quickly

    Yeah, it has the right connotation, though it might imply that these
    builds are put out more frequently than they really are... "monthly"
    would be more accurate at that.


I would prefer "testing" as the name. Generally we don't refer to things as "stable" or "unstable", and involving dates in any way such as "monthly" is inviting people to ask "why hasn't this been updated? it's been a month". The release process is in Github and the repo, so a PR can be made to add such a thing by anyone. Once done we could update the website. I would not advise changing things such as sending it to Github for download, the bandwidth from the downloads server isn't a problem.

Sounds good, I thought this might have involved more on the backend. I submitted a PR to the CI repo in the only place I found any reference to the -current suffix, so hopefully that does the trick. When you say "update the website", are you referring to the downloads server or the documentation (which is now also in Git)?

--
_____________________________________________________________________
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-dev mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev

Reply via email to