again just trying to help

when i signed up for the new mailing list

see headers below,

a few things to note, return address & from address needs to match, this is a common spam filter which is enabled on my email server.

You have no idea how many emails come in saying from "Paul Kudla <groups.io>" for example which my server picks up as a bad email address before delivery. (Because Paul Kudla is p...@scom.ca ?)

Reply-to carries the same issues which is why they are ignored coming through the system.

on other notes postfix is programmed for FQDN and reverse ip looks etc that must match the sending smtp serve sending the emails. Sincce stuff is showing up that does not appear to be an issue but thought i should mention that.

also note i and no one else opens an entire domain like groups.io or any other domain(s)

it would be like allowing all email from *@gmail.com

just not practical.

scom.ca is a small provider compared to others but over 80% of my email server traffic is spam, hacks etc and programming is in place to prevent anything from wrecking a customers account (viruses, blacklisted ip's etc) - this is what prompted the SPAMCOP.NET issue as it is one for the dnsbl lookups on my postfix server. I had access to the log files so was able to track that down, but another question it seems if email bounces back to groups.io do you get a report ? - a lot of email servers like microsoft do not report bouncebacks thus making it hard to trace issues upon setup.

I know you are restricted by the groups.io and apparently this is a free account, which is why i suggested if groups.io can interface to an external email server or at least an external out smtp server that is programmed with all the correct setups (spf,dkim,ssl etc etc)

it seems you need to be in more control of the outbound email side.

inbound emails could still be received by the groups.io server on the mx record side ?

just a thought out load as I am not fimiliar with groups.io setup up until now. It seems a lot of assumptions are being made (aka willy nilly sending emails without proper formats?) because groups.io is doing things on your behalf.

________________________________________________________________________
Return-Path: <confirmbounce+8107350+4201506166695547...@groups.io>
Delivered-To: p...@scom.ca
Received: from mail18.scom.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1])
        by mail18.scom.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86B773308F7
        for <p...@scom.ca>; Wed,  3 Jan 2024 02:13:33 -0500 (EST)
Received-SPF: Pass (sender SPF authorized) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=66.175.222.12; helo=mail01.groups.io; envelope-from=confirmbounce+8107350+4201506166695547...@groups.io; receiver=p...@scom.ca
Received: from mail01.groups.io (web01.groups.io [66.175.222.12])
        by mail19.scom.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 013452F6DF9
        for <p...@scom.ca>; Tue,  2 Jan 2024 09:35:50 -0500 (EST)
DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha256; bh=2L8kigt5JlfFeasByEEfmpZEBvHgEpI5D0C/6Dtxwms=;
 c=relaxed/simple; d=groups.io;

h=From:To:Reply-To:Subject:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:Precedence:Content-Type;
 s=20140610; t=1704206151; v=1;
 b=H37esqpfH2WJ7IbV3AaYjdY2YLm58eBwUDG8rVasNWR4MD3pv0IpRALutqCv/sA/rqVIdeGh

QUjXyJR+AsDXYI8xdS6lzmHT4/8uGE671pm/fvh8DOGdaMQgCTjGfNLRT2qxqGpZskq4q/4/0Vc
 t9mPEUguroQyf6iz/EBrgO1U=
From: "Groups.io Notification" <confirmbou...@groups.io>
To: p...@scom.ca
Reply-To: "Groups.io" <confirm+4201506166695547482+8107...@groups.io>
Subject: [asterisk-dev] Confirm your p...@scom.ca email address
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Tue, 02 Jan 2024 02:35:51 -0800
Message-ID: <0xtb.1704191751905265532.l...@groups.io>
Precedence: Bulk
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="xZWc9K0oFmhWfFZXJjTn"
X-SCOM-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information
X-SCOM-MailScanner-ID: 013452F6DF9.A9F4D
X-SCOM-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-SCOM-MailScanner-From: confirmbounce+8107350+4201506166695547...@groups.io
X-Spam-Status: No
X-TMDA-Confirm-Done: 1704206180.77180.0d6479
X-TMDA-Released: Wed, 03 Jan 2024 02:13:32 -0500
X-TMDA-CGI: 10.0.0.5 (Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:109.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/115.0)


--xZWc9K0oFmhWfFZXJjTn
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hello,

Thank you for your interest in the https://groups.io/g/asterisk-dev group a=
t Groups.io. If you did not request or do not want to join asterisk-dev@gro=
ups.io, please ignore this message.

_____________________________________________________________________


Have A Happy Friday !!!

Thanks - Paul Kudla (Manager SCOM.CA Internet Services Inc.)


Scom.ca Internet Services <http://www.scom.ca>
004-1009 Byron Street South
Whitby, Ontario - Canada
L1N 4S3

Toronto 416.642.7266
Main 1.866.411.7266
Fax 1.888.892.7266
Email p...@scom.ca

On 1/4/2024 9:06 AM, aster...@phreaknet.org wrote:

Could you point out a specific message where this is the case?
I just looked at a few messages and I don't see bou...@groups.io anywhere.
The MAIL FROM address used in the SMTP transaction is a VERP-style address, unique for every recipient on a list. This way if there is a bounce, groups.io knows who bounced and can automatically unsubscribe them, without reading the bounce message at all.
Even the confirmation email I got uses a VERP-style address.

The From headers are sometimes manipulated as you may have noticed, as when domains are configured with a DMARC policy, groups.io will rewrite the From header so it still looks almost the same but is using their domain. The old list did not do this, so to Josh's point about mailing list messages frequently going to spam, that may have been due to DMARC, and so deliverability might increase with the new list since it's handling it properly.

There is a List-Id header that contains the address of the mailing list. Perhaps you can use that in your filtering? If you're really an ISP though, you should be allowing all groups.io stuff to go through since there are a huge number of other lists there.

On 1/4/2024 5:52 AM, Paul Kudla (SCOM.CA Internet Services Inc.) wrote:

Good morning

I got verified however the new mailing list is using

Asterisk Development Team via groups.io <bou...@groups.io>

note the bou...@groups.io

should really be an asterisk email address

if i open up groups.io (like msvc etc) then spam will flow

i am an isp and apologise for the comments knowing you are doing you best, just letting you know some difficulties before they become a large scale issue


Have A Happy Thursday !!!

Thanks - Paul Kudla (Manager SCOM.CA Internet Services Inc.)


Scom.ca Internet Services <http://www.scom.ca>
004-1009 Byron Street South
Whitby, Ontario - Canada
L1N 4S3

Toronto 416.642.7266
Main 1.866.411.7266
Fax 1.888.892.7266
Email p...@scom.ca

On 2024-01-02 8:55 a.m., asterisk-dev-boun...@lists.digium.com wrote:
On 1/2/2024 5:55 AM, Joshua C. Colp wrote:
On Tue, Jan 2, 2024 at 6:41 AM Paul Kudla <p...@scom.ca <mailto:p...@scom.ca>> wrote:


    Good morning

    Note I am unable to confirm my new email on the group because the
    email
    is using a blocked server ??

    mail19       01-02 05:35:51 {postfix.in <http://postfix.in>}
     [63603] (1871410360) Jan 02
    05:35:51 mail19 postfix/smtpd[63603]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from

    web01.groups.io <http://web01.groups.io>[66.175.222.12]: 454 4.7.1
    Service unavailable; Client
    host [66.175.222.12] blocked using

    bl.spamcop.net <http://bl.spamcop.net>; Blocked - see
    https://www.spamcop.net/bl.shtml?66.175.222.12;

from=<confirmbounce+8107350+4201506166695547...@groups.io
<mailto:confirmbounce%2b8107350%2b4201506166695547...@groups.io>>
    to=<p...@scom.ca <mailto:p...@scom.ca>> proto=ESMTP

    helo=<mail01.groups.io <http://mail01.groups.io>>

    I did get the signup and also set my password but am unable to
    proceed.

    SPAMCOP.NET <http://SPAMCOP.NET> is super flexible (ie will track
    and update bad ip's on the
    fly within 24 hours, so to land on this list means a server has been
    very very bad.

    let me know if i can help further.


I don't think either of us can really help. Looking at groups.io <http://groups.io> posts this appears to happen sometimes, be it as a remaining result of a Yahoo migration that occurred in the past or from group admins adding email addresses for SpamCop spam traps in some capacity.

InterLinked: You previously stated that most lists you've been on migrated to groups.io <http://groups.io>, has this been a problem for them and if so how did they approach it (if at all)?

I have to be on at least 2 or 3 dozen groups.io lists at this point and I've not really seen this be much of a problem. It haven't seen it on any of my lists with 100+ members or really heard about it on other lists. Occasionally, maybe a couple times a year, there are *bounces* and I know groups.io will auto unsubscribe users if it gets bounces to comply with email subscription policies and what not. I don't have any specific experience with SpamCop, that isn't a service I use on my mail servers.

I think this is going to be inevitable to some extent with any hosted mailing list. groups.io has a pool of IPs that they use but obviously they are shared between lists. Digium has been self-hosting lists so it hasn't had to worry about this in the past.

groups.io also has an online portal where you can register and manage groups, but that probably entails receiving an email at some point so you might run into the same issue there if you can't receive email.

Can you add the sender to your "safe senders" lists? IMO email services that don't allow the spam rules to be overridden are fundamentally flawed, but I realize you may not have control over that or be able to switch services.

It probably doesn't hurt to get in touch with the guy that runs groups.io, here: https://groups.io/helpcenter. I and others have reached out before for things and he's helpful and responsive.





--
_____________________________________________________________________
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

asterisk-dev mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev

Reply via email to