Oracle does do a good job. but there are others that cost less, However if you really do need Ocacle I'd argue it's worth the price. There is also IBM's DB2
If you need free then: PostgreSQL is well known and is not unlike Oracle. PostgreSQL traces it's roots back to the first ever relational database: Ingres. Was designed by academics who understood database theory. But look into "SAP DB" too. It's very mature, robust and has a billion dollor company that supports it. And it's free, open source (GPL'd) now. http://www.sapdb.org/ Borland's Interbase is a lighter weight system that is good too. --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Certainly, Oracle does a bangup job there and it's almost as > affordable as MySQL. > > Chris Albertson wrote: > > > > Would it just be easier to use a database system that managed > concurent > > access better? Most all of them don't have trouble with this and > > don't require work-arounds like hot copies and so on. > ===== Chris Albertson Home: 310-376-1029 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cell: 310-990-7550 Office: 310-336-5189 [EMAIL PROTECTED] KG6OMK __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Tax Center - forms, calculators, tips, more http://taxes.yahoo.com/ _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
